Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Technology\s+and\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Technology\s+and\s+Contesting\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Technology and Contesting (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:06:14 -0400; A few observations: -- Cheating has the potential to affect the outcome of some contests more than others. Sweepstakes, in particular, is often decided by just a few QSOs, long after all possible mul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00315.html (8,698 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology and Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:00:16 -0700; participants. Good luck with that one! IMHO, operating ethics and honor go hand in hand. The rampant infestation of selfish out-of-turn caller LIDS who fail to 'honor' the DX op's attempt to complet; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00320.html (7,671 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology and Contesting (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:34:48 -0400; Amen to that! 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00345.html (7,463 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]