Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+good\s+old\s+U\.S\.\s+holiday\s+weekend\s+contest\s+debate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+good\s+old\s+U\.S\.\s+holiday\s+weekend\s+contest\s+debate\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: "Scott R." <w4pa@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:14:23 -0800 (PST); Amuse me, can we rehash a tired old debate for a little while on the reflector? Make sure to read all of this before flaming me, because the status quo for CQ WW CW works for me at the moment. But I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00576.html (13,252 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: "AB2E Darrell" <ab2e@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:39:56 -0500; Hi Scott and everyone, I believe the rationale behind not changing the weekends, is that those particular holidays are only holidays in the US. These are world-wide contests with participants from al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00577.html (10,214 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:39:42 +0000; Hi Scott, I can't g ive you a logical reason why not. I really like the idea. Press on! 73, Tom K5IID At 16:14 03/31/04, Scott R. wrote: Amuse me, can we rehash a tired old debate for a little while; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00579.html (15,186 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:28:14 -0600; I have a solution that's probably easier to accomplish than changing contest dates. The U.S. should hold its Thanksgiving when we do - mid-October... 73, kelly ve4xt weekend contest debate little whi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00581.html (15,692 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:34:38 EST; that won't work...it'll interfere with the PA & IL QSO Parties! ;-) 73-Chuck KI9A -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00584.html (8,632 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:38:13 -0500; Maybe because the sponsors are U.S. organizations. 73, Nat WZ3AR -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00585.html (8,642 bytes)
7. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:28:24 -0600; I really like contests to fall on holiday weekends, in particular Thanksgiving! At least I used to before I retired. Many have to work on Friday nights and/or weekends and cannot get loose for contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00587.html (9,611 bytes)
8. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 31 Mar 2004 23:27:14 -0600; OTOH, as long as WW CW is on the weekend after Thanksgiving, I will *never* be able to be on hand for the beginning of the contest... (because I work Fridays until 2230 CT - 0330 Saturday UTC - and T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00001.html (8,813 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:04:37 +0100; Two things on my wish list: 1) Get the Minnesota DNR to move the opening weekend of Deer Season away from CW SS weekend. 2) Move the ARRL 10 Meter contest away from the darkest time of the year. We g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00002.html (15,264 bytes)
10. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 15:39:20 -0400; This is a topic of lively conversation around my house, too. Seems to me the easiest thing to do would be to alternate the CW and SSB weekends every year. This would ensure that the contest falls on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00100.html (9,430 bytes)
11. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:00:57 -0400; Hi Dick: Now I could live with that change !!! Single Mode op's shouldn't care. Multi Mode op's shouldn't care. Propargation shouldn't care. Now the big BITCH could be: Which contest first for the fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00106.html (10,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]