- 1. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 13:30:09 2002
- Does anyone have any thoughts on what the QST editorial board really wants in the way of contesting feature articles? I've published multiple articles in the NCJ and CQ Contest that I first sent in t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00445.html (9,184 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 14:55:16 2002
- Responding to two messages: 1. Ward, one correction. The Contest Coverage Working Group is not pulled together yet. We need volunteers. Here's what we need in terms of skills and experience: - Long-t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00446.html (8,398 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: hwardsil1@mindspring.com (hwardsil1@mindspring.com)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 14:49:47 2002
- I think it depends on the focus of the article. If, for example, it's a how-to that is specific to contest operation (say, a SO2R switchbox), then it's probably too narrow for QST. But that type of a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00448.html (9,823 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 15:05:14 2002
- I think Ken makes a good point. In the period leading up to the Board meeting, there were a number of messages from the ARRL staff regarding their willingness to trade enhanced contest article conten
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00449.html (8,607 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
- Date: Tue Jan 22 20:31:53 2002
- The question should be generalized, and not just apply to contesting. I submitted an article about an early packet radio system (Digicom for the C-64) back in 1987. QST rejected it. 73 publshed it. A
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00451.html (9,929 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 15:27:23 2002
- And yet, less than two years ago, an article I wrote about the (long) history of contesting at the University of Texas (OK, so we're already licensed college students and not bright, rosy-cheeked 8-y
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00454.html (9,121 bytes)
- 7. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: k1ta@contesting.com (Bob Marston)
- Date: Tue Jan 22 20:43:23 2002
- Ward I've been following this matter with a keen interest as events have unfolded. I have been licensed since 1972 and a contester since 1974. I have been a Life Member of the ARRL from 1974. I also
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00462.html (11,239 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
- Date: Wed Jan 23 00:51:11 2002
- I was asked to write an introduction to contesting that appeared in the November 2000 QST under the title, "Discover the Wonderful World of Contesting" (my title, so don't blame the editors if you t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00463.html (18,677 bytes)
- 9. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Jan 23 10:32:38 2002
- Wow! You mean people actually READ and BUILD from those articles? Amazing. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00466.html (8,738 bytes)
- 10. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
- Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
- Date: Wed Jan 23 10:40:11 2002
- I believe I was one of the people who purchased the software and built my own board from scratch for the DIGICOM. Great little program. I got several years of use out of it. I know of at least one DX
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00467.html (8,482 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu