Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Time\s+to\s+QSY\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Time\s+to\s+QSY\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:03:17 -0400; Best single-element, 160 compromise antenna I've used at many QTHs is the so-called K2KQ Double-L. (http://www.yccc.org/Articles/double_l.htm) Balanced, no radials required, vertical polarization wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00337.html (14,784 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:21:03 -0500; The best part is, with some compromise, you can make it work even if you dont have an 80-foot tower. Note to John, K1AR: more posts like these, fewer about DQs 73, kelly, ve4xt ______________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00345.html (15,726 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: Wes Jennings <wjennings2011@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:27:09 +0000; Thanks another option for low bands ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 8:03; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00348.html (15,387 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:05:40 -0500; That is definitely I suggestion/plan I might be interested in. I live in a pretty small city lot and want to improve my 80 meter signal, but the wife has turned most of the very small backyard into a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00352.html (17,732 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:24:19 -0400; Try it out, John. I suggested the Double-L to my friend Cary, VE4EA, who lives on a postage-stamp-sized lot in Winnipeg, MB. Rather than 90 feet vertical, Cary ended up with 42 or so feet vertical. H; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00354.html (19,508 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? (score: 1): Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:18:47 -0400; Many years ago the "WW-CONTEST" group was created to discuss subjects specific to this particular contest. I remember even CT1BOH was a member at some point. :-) But for some reasons it didn't become; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00368.html (9,367 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]