Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Top\s+CQWW\s+2023\s+CW\+SSB\s+Loggers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Top CQWW 2023 CW+SSB Loggers (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:17:01 -0400
Top loggers in the 16942 CQWW 2023 CW+SSB public logs are: 52.2% N1MM+ 6.3% N3FJP 5.2% CTESTWIN 4.4% DXLog.net 3.8% Win-Test 3.7% QARTest 3.3% UcxLog 2.1% TR4W 1.3% Writelog 1.2% 5MContest 1.0% RUMlo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-05/msg00005.html (6,809 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top CQWW 2023 CW+SSB Loggers (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 15:39:27 -0400
That is very different from the 2022 (actually 2023) WRTC participants. I assume that most casual contesters are using N1MM. I wonder what software the higher scoring CQWW stations are using? N1MM+ 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-05/msg00007.html (7,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu