Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Tossing\s+meaningless\s+categories\s+\[was\:\s+Logcheckingquestions\]\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestions] (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:46:55 -00
-- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb way. Wouldn't satisfy me. If we can only have two categories, I'd like to see: 1) I did it all myself. (LP/HP/QRP) 2) I had some help from some other guys. (LP/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00336.html (8,273 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestions] (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:49:56 -0600
In Bill's suggested category 1. for strictly limited hardware setup, I would like to suggest that a limitation on tower/antenna height might be useful. It could be 50 or 60 or 70 feet, or maybe 15 or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00339.html (11,725 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestions] (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:38:07 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your focus is on personnel; mine is on hardware. I believe there should be a combination of both. 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00350.html (7,761 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestions] (score: 1)
Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:52:44 -0800
transisters?] [hallicrafters, icom?] but i do agree with hans, this is a more reasonable divison of resources mike w7dra _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00353.html (7,826 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu