Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Unsportsmanlike\s+Conduct\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Sat Mar 29 16:14:35 2003
I noted, during the WPX contest, that EO6F was calling CQ CONTEST NO USA, in protest of the ongoing war. This is a real shame, as historically, amateur radio has pretty much kept political difference
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00276.html (7,673 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date: Mon Mar 31 03:11:45 2003
Not only the above, but he posted a derogatory message on the Logger reflector which was so bad the sysop removed him from the reflector. I maintain the master data and friend files for the RTTY guys
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00281.html (7,676 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: km9m-zig@attbi.com (S. Markowski Jr.)
Date: Mon Mar 31 03:20:59 2003
I agree 100%, and have already emailed the Contest director. Darn shame! 73, Zig Markowski KM9M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00282.html (8,847 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon Mar 31 03:48:26 2003
In the last few months we have all heard many moronic opinions mostly inspired by FOXNEWS. W2UP has climbed up into the top 10 ten. Where does it say in the contest rules you 'MUST' work certain stat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00283.html (9,622 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: eric@K3NA.ORG (Eric Scace K3NA)
Date: Mon Mar 31 06:16:04 2003
Hi Barry -- You raised an interesting question which will likely stimulate many messages. I disagree with your recommendation for the following reasons. I didn't operate the contest, so I didn't hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00284.html (9,965 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: n3bb@mindspring.com (Jim George)
Date: Mon Mar 31 08:32:24 2003
I agree with Eric. We might detest EO6F's position, but he hurts himself by eliminating the USA quantity and multiplier numbers in the WPX, and breaks no contest rule as far as I can tell. Have the U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00286.html (10,204 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Mar 31 09:18:05 2003
I don't see that EO6F broke any rules. If he didn't want to work USA, so what? It's only one station and a handful of possible QSO's. Move on to someone else. You aren't going to be able to work ever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00289.html (8,953 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: k0emt@dbBear.com (Bryan - k0emt)
Date: Mon Mar 31 09:20:10 2003
With having emailed directly with Barry and seeing others corroborating posts on the subject, I would agree that any station that was not working another because of nationality should be disqualified
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00290.html (9,464 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne)
Date: Mon Mar 31 18:51:38 2003
I guess it is alright for EO6F to be able to say whatever he wants but it's not alright for Barry to say what he wants. Anyone besides me see something wrong here? Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00293.html (8,269 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin)
Date: Mon Mar 31 12:50:47 2003
I'm curious. He wouldn't work USA/UK stations because of his political feelings. Where's he going to send his log? dale, kg5u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00294.html (8,228 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com (BobK8IA@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 14:28:05 2003
I listened to the EO6F anti-American diatribe on 15m, shook my head in disgust and spun the dial. Just like I do when I hear crap on 75m from USA guys I dont agree with. He broke no contest rules and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00295.html (8,208 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Mon Mar 31 19:30:17 2003
Review the WPX rules. In point XV, mention is made of unsportsmanlike conduct as a reason for disqualification. I have no problem with free speech, whether it agrees with me or not. I do have a probl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00297.html (12,779 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: henry@summitschool.com (Henry)
Date: Mon Mar 31 15:05:53 2003
Asbestos scivvies are put on... Other than EO6F's politicial opinions, whats the difference between what he did and the the several SA stations calling "CQ contest- only JA pse..."? Granted , his sco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00301.html (12,118 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (Hans K0HB)
Date: Mon Mar 31 20:24:11 2003
Hey N7MAL, It doesn't mean W2UP was moronic, it meant his opinion was different than yours, it's neither right or wrong just different. Accept his opinion for what it is, his opinion, and get over y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00304.html (7,971 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones)
Date: Mon Mar 31 14:22:41 2003
Tom, I tend to lean toward extending the American tradition of free speech to Barry as well as to EO6F. Amateur Radio is not and should not be enforced as a "politics free zone", but instead should b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00312.html (9,758 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: k1my@msn.com (bruce makas)
Date: Mon Mar 31 15:45:44 2003
Barry, Very well put. I agree 100% with your comments and feel that there is no excuse for what he did, none at all. There is no doubt in my mind that he should be disqualified for unsportsmanlike co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00314.html (14,642 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: dennis.mcalpine@verizon.net (Dennis McAlpine)
Date: Mon Mar 31 17:42:14 2003
Good point, Dale. Maybe he is going to have his log print out in red or something bizarre like that. Is there a EU depot to send logs? Personally, I thought ham radio was a non-political hobby and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00315.html (10,669 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: barry@mxg.com (Barry Merrill)
Date: Mon Mar 31 21:56:36 2003
"but one of the premises of contesting is that it requires cooperation of all stations involved." Independent of the irrational actions of an individual ham, politics have always been a hidden part o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00318.html (8,398 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: sm0jhf@chello.se (SM0JHF)
Date: Tue Apr 1 00:58:17 2003
One thing that puzzles me regarding an operator calling CQ CONTEST NO USA in a contest that is sponsored by an USA magazine, the contest committee is all-USA, the logs must be sent to the USA, the re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00001.html (7,563 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor Sokolov)
Date: Tue Apr 1 08:29:48 2003
Barry, since you mentioned Olimpics please recall 1980 Olimpics in Moscow. Politics are part of everything since long ago. Olimpics included. I think the best behavior is not to pay attention to suc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00003.html (8,246 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu