- 1. [CQ-Contest] Very old callbooks? [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:04:17 -0500
- I'm not certain where to ask this question, but there's a pretty good depth of 'ham history knowledge' available on this reflector... Is there (or was there) US Amateur callbooks published in the 192
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00260.html (6,683 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Very old callbooks? [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:38:21 -0000
- Check ARRL ??? Quack I'm not certain where to ask this question, but there's a pretty good depth of 'ham history knowledge' available on this reflector... Is there (or was there) US Amateur callbooks
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00261.html (7,641 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Very old callbooks? [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:02:10 -0500
- Man, this WAS the right reflector to ask this question! I had 9 responses sitting in my inbox when I checked my email this morning. The consensus points to 'YES' as the answer to my question. It was
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00271.html (8,139 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Very old callbooks? [OT] (score: 1)
- Author: "JAMES HEADRICK" <W3CP@CHARTER.NET>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:01:52 -0000
- Bob, My memory is that the US Gov. Printing Office put out a Radio Call Book back in the late 1920s. The familiar US Amateur Callbook was available in the 1930s. I think the QCWA must have a collecti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00273.html (7,988 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu