Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Vote\s+now\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Vote\s+now\!\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:52:48 -0800; This conversation about sending your call in the SS exchange brings to mind a slightly related subject that I would like people to vote on. You can vote by getting on the air - and adopting the metho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00308.html (8,287 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: Denis Pochuev - K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:50:30 -0800; This discussion about the call inside the SS exchange, in my mind, has broader implications, particularly for a certain upcoming big contest. I unconsciously appreciated hearing my call in the exchan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00322.html (10,466 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:58:40 -0500; [...] [...] Interesting problem for the S&P op. If I remember correctly this issue was gnawed upon a year or three back with strong opinions expressed on both sides. My immediate reaction is to say,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00329.html (7,931 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:46:44 -0600; Unfortunately the subject line is in error and should read "vote a year from now when nobody remembers the question." I'm probably on the high side of the bell curve for "Old Geezers" and I generally; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00331.html (8,217 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:45:55 +0000; Hi Denis: You are slowing down the run station's rate just as much as your own. Not selfless at all. This is usually unnecessary (IMHO), but certainly sometimes is definitely a GREAT idea. As usual,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00334.html (7,628 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:52:15 -0800; The other side of this coin is what the running station sends. One can argue that it would be equally if not more helpful if the running station acknowledgement were W1QQQ TU W3YYY SS instead of just; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00335.html (9,283 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1): Author: John Unger <w4au@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:31:03 -0500; I vote yes. Of course, this procedure is SOP in the Sprint contests and really does give you confidence that the other guy is actually working you and not someone inside your skip zone. Good idea. 73; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00357.html (8,347 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]