Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+W3NQN\s+Bandpass\s+Filters\s+$Was\:\s+Re\:\s+419\s+band\s+passfilters\.\.\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+W3NQN\s+Bandpass\s+Filters\s+$Was\:\s+Re\:\s+419\s+band\s+passfilters\.\.\.\.\.$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] W3NQN Bandpass Filters (Was: Re: 419 band passfilters.....) (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@k8nd.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:48:36 -0400; While ours are not nearly so old, we have four sets of W3NQN filters on the four full-power station positions at the PJ2T station on Curacao, plus a spare set. No doubt, the W3NQN filters are Best o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00618.html (7,995 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] W3NQN Bandpass Filters (Was: Re: 419 band passfilters.....) (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:01:19 -0500; Dear Zoli-- I am sorry to disagree with you in the extreme. I did much of the original testing (along with K3LR) on the W3NQN filters as well as additional testing on ICE and Dunestar filters, and t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00635.html (9,472 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]