Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\:\s+New\s+rule\s+for\s+Multi\-Single\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\:\s+New\s+rule\s+for\s+Multi\-Single\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX: New rule for Multi-Single??? (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Fri Mar 16 11:19:58 2001; OLD RULE 2. Multi Operator (All band operation only) (a) Single-Transmitter: Only one transmitter and one band permitted during the same time period (defined as 10 minutes). NEW RULE 2. Multi-Operato; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00236.html (9,198 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WPX: New rule for Multi-Single??? (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Sat Mar 17 00:39:34 2001; Bob, I believe that you're interpretation is correct. The WPX multi-single is now the same as the CQWW multi-single. I'm not sure that this is a good thing in the long run, but it will keep the guys; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00242.html (10,814 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WPX: New rule for Multi-Single??? (score: 1): Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew); Date: Sat Mar 17 02:56:42 2001; Bob, I read the rule the same way as you. If you are indeed correct, then this is a brilliant change which the MS category in WPX has been in dire need of for years. With the old rule, the MS categor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00247.html (8,700 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]