Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Contest\s+Spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Contest\s+Spots\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest Spots (score: 1): Author: ns3t@arrl.net (Jamie Dupree); Date: Wed Apr 10 21:58:16 2002; After going thru some 17,000 spots from the CQ WPX SSB contest over the past week, I figured it was time to share some of my work with the reflector. As in the ARRL DX contests, I again found evidenc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00119.html (7,702 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest Spots (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com (Georgek5kg@aol.com); Date: Wed Apr 10 23:32:36 2002; Jamie, I too am appaled at the thought of self-spotting or even disguised self-spotting. However, I am curious why you will be forwarding any findings of your analysis to "those in charge of the WPX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00121.html (8,679 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest Spots (score: 1): Author: f5nly@free.fr (F5NLY); Date: Thu Apr 11 18:07:11 2002; Wow, interesting to see some sounds of "auto-spotting"... a point read in WPX rules. 73 Lee. -- Original Message -- From: Jamie Dupree To: cq-contest@contesting.com Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:5; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00123.html (8,426 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest Spots (score: 1): Author: david.e.burger@au.pwcglobal.com (david.e.burger@au.pwcglobal.com); Date: Fri Apr 12 12:02:31 2002; I have never been able to use spotting in any contests, as generally my contest station is out of range of convention carrier networks, but was amazed to see I had been spotted over 20 times - and by; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00125.html (7,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]