Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Survey\s+results\s+\#4\s+\-\s+Operating\s+Time\s+Limits\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:59:36 -0800
The latest chapter of the WPX Contest survey results have been posted at http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/ This installment covers the question asking if the maximum operating time for single operators shou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00123.html (7,029 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:07:02 +0000 (GMT)
I am open to the idea of creating a limited time category. However, I dont want to give people a reason not to be on the air and making contacts! What do you think is the best solution? (K5ZD). Your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00128.html (9,836 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: "Chris DL8MBS" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:53:19 +0100
About the fear of possibly shrinking activity with shorter time-based categories: Already now without them the majority of log-submitting participants operate less than half-time (i.e. 90 rpt 90 perc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00131.html (9,503 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 04:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Do you think operational time will increase as 10 and 15 start opening more reliably and often? This may be part of the drop off in hours, it's hard to stay awake at very low rates. 73, Julius Julius
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00144.html (11,716 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:33:44 -0700
I'm not sure the 15% figure for a return to 30 hours is totally valid (I voted to stay at 36 hours, by the way). The survey results are of course very interesting and very useful, but we have to be c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00150.html (12,240 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results #4 - Operating Time Limits (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:57:45 -0800
The purpose of the survey was to gather the opinions of the WPX Contest participants. In that regard, it did exactly what was expected and did so extremely well! I love that there are so many people
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00160.html (15,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu