Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+no\s+\#\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+no\s+\#\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX no # (score: 1): Author: spa@tri.net (spa); Date: Fri Mar 31 12:30:31 2000; What do you do for the WPX QSO with the North African station that just replies "59 no number" I listened for a while and that is the same report for everyone, but was working a good string. N0UU. --; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00313.html (6,410 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WPX no # (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri Mar 31 15:47:46 2000; That's not a contact - you didn't exchange the necessary information to qualify as one. You cracked the pileup but it's not a contest contact. Next time say something like, "Can I use your number one; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00314.html (6,910 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WPX no # (score: 1): Author: g3sjj@btinternet.com (G3SJJ); Date: Fri Mar 31 20:19:09 2000; Or, what about CQ9K not giving RST. Just serial number. I thought the correct exchange was RST and Number? I guess he won't claim for these Qs? Or perhaps that is acceptable in a competitive situatio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00315.html (6,514 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] WPX no # (score: 1): Author: w9wi@bellsouth.net (Doug Smith); Date: Sat Apr 1 00:10:00 2000; Hold down either "Alt" key and type "000" on the numeric keypad. This inserts an ASCII "null" - which is, after all, what he gave you for a number. (please don't do this for real, your software isn'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00002.html (6,443 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]