Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+glitches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+glitches\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Tue Jul 16 16:40:50 2002; It seems that with all the effort to provide similar transceiver, location, and antennas that the same software would be used. And the software should be tested beforehand. I always run several diffe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00180.html (7,064 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Tue Jul 16 18:46:31 2002; I don't think I'd want to be the one to tell a WRTC competitor who has used CT for 10 years that he has to learn TRLog or SuperDuper or whatever. I believe it's pretty much the same reasoning behind; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00181.html (7,684 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed Jul 17 10:33:53 2002; No effort was made to "provide similar transceivers," only antennas, supports and rotators. The competitors were required by the rules to provide their own radios. Likewise, they were required to pro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00191.html (7,540 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches (score: 1): Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Fri Jul 19 04:35:29 2002; It is difficult to get logging software perfect for a contest that only occurs every 2, 4, or 6 years and has different rules each time! N6TR, K1EA, and W5XD (+SM6SRW) all did extra work to support W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00243.html (9,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]