Although it is certainly implied, the rules listed on the WW-Digi website do not specifically prohibit using more than one signal at the same time ON THE SAME BAND for the single op category. They s
Dave - is this actually REALLY quickly synchronized separate transmissions to 3 different stations? Or are there 3 simultaneous transmissions occurring at exactly the same time? If its the former, it
Well, I've read the contest rules several times, and they don't specifically make the same "one signal per band" limitation for single op that they do for multiop. I agree that it is assumed, but ag
Dave, You are not alone, yet another crying wolf here... I have had some direct correspondence on this very topic. I proposed to change the rule to "Only one signal on the band of operation is permit
There are several software packages available that have taken the WSJT decoding engine and created the ability to make multiple QSOs at the same time. It is just a matter of sending tones on multiple
You dont need multiple rigs...or multiple copies of the software to do it....one copy of the software will do it, if set for dxpedition mode, I think the most I saw was 5 at one time...3 at a time is
Sounds to me like multiple streams is the nature of the beast in digi contesting. Those interested in it should embrace it. Ed N1UR You dont need multiple rigs...or multiple copies of the software to
Well it could be considered seperate signals, but actually what is beig transmitted is three tone sets on one signal. The receivers on the other end decode them as 3 seperate signals because that is
On 8/6/2019 5:30 PM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote: There are several software packages available that have taken the WSJT decoding engine and created the ability to make multiple QSOs at the same time.
Well, I admit I didn't know that. If that's the case, it would certainly make for an interesting situation in a contest. And if everyone can rather easily have that functional capability, I'm not e
This is an example of the DXpedition "Fox and Hound" mode where the DXpedition station is the Fox and transmits 2-5 distinct audio frequencies within his TX passband using a single suppressed carrier
Then why don't the WW-Digi rules simply state that such operation (multiple QSOs on the same band using Fox/Hound mode) is not allowed. Most contesters are NOT going to be aware of, or maybe not eve
Am I the only one that is thinking "wow what a mess this is going to be" after reading this post? Sounds accurate. Sounds completely caotic. I thought the mess on ARRL DX SSB on 40M was a mess. Thats
Sounds like multiple communication streams simultaneous transmitted on one signal. The signal is an RF term. Audio tones - however many there are in the RF Signal bandwidth employed - are not separat
MSHV is a program that can answer multiple FT8 calls at the same time, as can WSJT-X in Fox mode. Gordon - N1MGO Well, I've read the contest rules several times, and they don't specifically make the
Is this really an issue? The FTx bandwidth is a fraction of most modes. So if there are multiple streams per instance, the occupied BW is still pretty minimal. And contest results are going to be
Hi guys, <<<<<I disagree that Fox/Hound is the only way to transmit multiple signals at the same time. I'm pretty certain I could do it with multiple rigs and running multiple instances of WSJT-X (w
Didn't someone create a FT8 contest reflector? It would be nice to take all these comments over there. Seems like FT8 is monopolizing the contest reflector just like it is on the air. Seems like the
My mistake, "only one signal..." so multiple rigs simultaneously inband are not possible. And SO2R allowed on diferents bands (were reading multi-op section). 73 de Dimitri F4DSK Envoyé depuis mon s
Check slides 19 and 20 of Ed's presentation over on the WW-Digi wb site, for a great visual representation of why this is a bad idea and how it's easy to detect rule violations: https://ww-digi.com/W