- 1. [CQ-Contest] WW CW comments (score: 1)
- Author: "Yuri Onipko" <va3uz@rac.ca>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:52:00 -0400
- Did somebody notice that comments published in Sep.2003 CQ magazine are actually CQ WW CW 2001 comments (not 2002 contest)? 73 VE3DZ -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICI
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00028.html (8,535 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW CW comments (score: 1)
- Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 07:29:08 +0300
- actually Also web site has old comments: http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/WW%20CW%20QRM%20WEB%20Sept%2003%2081203.pdf (and still missing multi op station operators - removing them from magazine was a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00035.html (9,434 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] WW CW comments (score: 1)
- Author: "Valeri Stefanov" <wally@el-soft.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:42:25 +0200
- Could anyone scan CQWW SSB and CW 2002 top scores for me and to send them to wally@el-soft.com THANKS in advance for the help. 73's de Wally LZ2CJ P.S. I again would repeat that it is time for CQ to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00052.html (7,241 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu