Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WW\s+SSB\s+on\s+my\s+mind\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "py2ny" <py2ny@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:37:41 -0300
just like information 1) First time that I lost my way, while trying to work at 20 m, and suddenly at 20h00 Z, some guys put me out of 14261 telling me that the frequency was to your exclusive use ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00046.html (7,728 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:41:06 -0800
Same type of thing on the Maritime Mobile Net at 14.300. There would be EU DX stations calling CQ 2 kc above or below 14.300. As soon as someone tried to answer them a Maritime Mobile Net freq Cop wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00089.html (9,556 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "SGT Korey Chandler" <korey.chandler@us.army.mil>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 05:43:46 -0000
The contest ops could have moved up 1kc and been polite. Too easy. The Maritime Net is not a "check in and ragchew net". Sure, the net control stations call for check-ins and keep the frequency "occu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00109.html (11,517 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <eu1sa@belsonet.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:48:41 -0600
Dear Korey, With all due respect to activities of nets like that why not to consider the following. Such a net is considered to be a tool to help people in trouble. Travellers can also suggest to cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00121.html (13,981 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "Cooper, Stewart" <coopers@odl.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:10:31 -0000
As posted to UK Contest reflector... I was asked very politely, when on 14.326, to QSY due to an upcoming hurricane net on 14325. I did so immediately, and was happy to do so, but I doubt that they e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00122.html (16,052 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:24:47 EST
The Maritime Net is not a "check in and ragchew net". Sure, the net control stations call for check-ins and keep the frequency "occupied". I check into the net quite often when in the USA and have be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00125.html (9,551 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 03 Nov 2005 07:49:41 -0600
IMHO the "legitimate" nets are victims of the "crying wolf" syndrome. There are **so many** nets & skeds which believe they're more important than any other use of the frequency that one simply *cann
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00127.html (8,701 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:36:13 -0600
would be to station K3LR or KC1XX on 14300 keeping the frequency clear for use in case a true emergency occurred. << Too much intelligent logic in that suggestion for it to ever happen. 73, Bob Nauma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00138.html (7,589 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:27:36 -0600
Or move all important nets to 14150.5? :-) 73 -Kirk K4RO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00147.html (8,006 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:28:46 -0600
Greetings, All; Personally, if I am going to venture offshore in a boat costing, presumably, many thousands of dollars, with a sizeable commitment of time, energy and skill, I am going to have a radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00183.html (13,574 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:16:28 +0000
Unless a /MM declares an emergency, amateurs working the /MM & the mere presence of most /MMs on the upper end of 20m is in blatant violation of local laws & international agreements - at least based
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00194.html (9,807 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu