Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Way\s+back\s+\-\s+ARRL\s+log\s+format\s+\-\-\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Way\s+back\s+\-\s+ARRL\s+log\s+format\s+\-\-\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Way back - ARRL log format -- suggestion for Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Bokverket" <info@bokverket.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 22:45:07 +0200; Personally, I think that there should be a way in Cabrillo to declare a contact as null, if you are not sure about the call or exchange. (Pardon me if this has been incorporated, I suggested it years; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00075.html (8,024 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Way back - ARRL log format -- suggestion for Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:34:43 -0500; This ability does exist for CQ WW and CQ WPX Contests. Simply place X- in front of the QSO line and the QSO will not count for your score, but will count for the other station. Example: QSO: 21150 PH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00076.html (9,271 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Way back - ARRL log format -- suggestion for Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:08:26 -0400; Yes, Goran this was incorporated a few years ago. The "QSO:" tag at the beginning of the line is changed to "X-QSO:" to exclude the QSO from checking. This is documented clearly in the Cabrillo V3 sp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00080.html (9,080 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]