Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+What\s+the\s+ARRL\s+Board\s+did\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 11:59:38 2002
From the Great Lakes Division Vice Director, KI4LA. 73 - Jim K8MR -- Dear Colleague, Thanks to so many of you who have responded to the SM reports/contest results issue after the proposal to remove t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00413.html (12,674 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand)
Date: Mon Jan 21 14:36:07 2002
Dear Walt W0CP, Gary KI4LA and Dennis W4PWF, Gary, thank you for posting the remarks, which I'm attaching for completeness. Like many active operators I subscribe to several e-mail reflectors on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00425.html (11,432 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Mon Jan 21 15:08:12 2002
** Snip ** flying, Latin? Classy! Your comments are a bit presumptuous. I think there was a proposal to review QST content. I believe you will find QST content reviews in the minutes a couple of time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00428.html (11,875 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: rhodes@evertek.net (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Mon Jan 21 18:57:21 2002
What a condescending load of crap. I am running out of patience with the way the league has been run for years. The "BOARD" decides what is good for us, then we are supposed to smile, pay our dues an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00431.html (10,030 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Tue Jan 22 09:37:37 2002
OK so it is french from the Latin word "fides," which means faith, and "complir," which means to complete. REF contest? Forgive me but I don't get it. Ford-N0FP ford@cmgate.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00438.html (8,523 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Tue Jan 22 01:22:48 2002
My sentiments, exactly, Gary! For the record, my biases are similar to yours, Gary--I am also a LM of ARRL since the 60's, active on HF and VHF; CW, SSB, RTTY and PSK31; and have a special interest i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00439.html (20,259 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus)
Date: Tue Jan 22 19:50:45 2002
Roland wrote in part: "We the membership barely had time to email our comments before the vote, and we were forced to respond based on preliminary information and rumor" That's because we the members
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00458.html (8,735 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Wed Jan 23 18:19:10 2002
Someone pointed out I didn't give my call. Wasn't trying to be anonymous. de Rol, K3RA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00491.html (22,282 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: W5JBP@aol.com (W5JBP@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 18:54:55 2002
Thanks for putting me in the loop. I just want to point out that not only did we suggest that instead of putting the board minutes on the web to save pages, we also offered to only print pages 10 and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00493.html (9,207 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand)
Date: Wed Jan 23 19:33:02 2002
Jim, Apparently, you just "don't get it!" Or if you do, you neglect to discuss it publicly. For me the furor over revamping QST content was just a triggering issue. The fundamental issue on balance i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00495.html (11,385 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus)
Date: Wed Jan 23 20:28:55 2002
Jim et al: The real point here is not the justification for the proposed actions. I'll bet most of us are willing to work towards a better future for contesting with the ARRL. The point here is Direc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00499.html (11,589 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders)
Date: Wed Jan 23 21:33:17 2002
Jim: Thank you for anwering my email, and for giving me the chance to be involved in the decision making of the ARRL. I am a strong supporter of the League, and have been for the 44 years I have been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00502.html (16,418 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Wed Jan 23 21:29:11 2002
I would guess that this comment garnered a lot of credibility and support for our cause... I object your honor. This is a hostile witness entering conjecture as evidence. Sustained. The witness will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00504.html (11,316 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu Jan 24 00:30:50 2002
Unfortunately it's not a dead horse. Just some of the public becoming tired of the same headlines. I have spent my time in the ARRL. Both Gary and I put in the time as the Section Manager of ENY. So
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00508.html (13,674 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand)
Date: Thu Jan 24 09:47:32 2002
Gollllllly! Amusing, but save us from the lawyers, please! And to think I was about to let this go, figuring I had made my point. I don't think so. Perhaps what we all should do from this point on is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00520.html (14,010 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 11:13:43 2002
Why? Your post was thoughtful and on target IMO. If anyone on this reflector DOES send you hate mail, I'd like to hear about it. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TowerTalk Administrator, one of the www.contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00529.html (7,964 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu