Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+When\s+it\'s\s+over\,\s+it\'s\s+over\s+\(again\)\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:59:21 -0500
We all agree that we're not allowed to manipulate the log after the Contest... "except for obvious typos," some say. I've always disagreed with that -- part of the job is to get the received info cor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00152.html (8,176 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:11:25 -0400
Good for you Art ! I am in the "obvious typos camp"...I either correct it on the fly or during pauses while CQing, or in rare exceptions at the very end of the contest make the 2 or 3 corrections wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00154.html (7,554 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:57:43 -0700
I had to X out my contact with ZL7G as I gave him a 599 and got a 599 but I didn't want to write it down to lose it so it went in the log with bogus received info...mine. Sadly my ears are not very g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00155.html (9,732 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
lol we send in our contest log without looking and to LOTW after the entry period ends. That's when I learned that I had forgotten to press 'enter' or something before moving to another band to work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00156.html (10,170 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:30:22 -0600
I generally agree with the idea of not post-massaging when it's to find errors not noted during the contest. But if I'm in a spirited run, notice a typo and do a CTRL-N to leave myself a note, my tak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00157.html (12,285 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:22:10 +0000
If YOU type "4" but your COMPUTER inserts "44", I'd feel comfortable correcting it. -- 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" -- Sea stories at --> http://K0HB.wordpress.com Superstition trails
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00158.html (10,761 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:39:59 -0700
I agree with Kelly. I would have no problem fixing a typo like N44ogw. Looking at other information like ck or section and changing that would cross my line as well. W0MU But if I'm in a spirited run
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00159.html (12,797 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:18:20 -0600
At the risk of setting off a "plastic owl pointing true north by remote control" thread... Why is it that we have contests at all? It is to practice our ability to communicate and to reward effectiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00161.html (10,969 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:07:22 -0600
Heres another question for the masses: I work WQ5L and log Ray as having a (fictitious, just guessing) check of 72, and later hear him giving out 73, is it OK to change? If I dont completely copy his
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00162.html (16,021 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:21:21 -0600 (CST)
I think of it this way... Go back circa 30-35 or more years, back in the dark ages before personal computers (or anything close to them) as we now know them were readily affordable and/or available.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00163.html (16,253 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:24:23 -0800
Right. Within my circle of contesters, it is considered good practice to fix typing mistakes (like "o" instead of zero), but not to correct mis-copied parts of the exchange (like wrong precedence, ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00164.html (9,250 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:37:04 -0500
Hi Jim. So, if you (or your circle of contesters) work WWxWWW with precedence "A" and then heard him later and realized it's "U", but not "A", you never go back and correct it to "U"? How is it diffe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00165.html (10,648 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
A great explanation of how we should consider this issue Ron. My conscience has no qualms about fixing obvious typo's as I happen to be one of the worst typists imaginable. I check the log only for c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00166.html (17,965 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:23:24 -0500
I worked VE4EA early in the contest, and he and Kelly were just getting set to go. I was worked on their second VFO, and the S&P memory was set with A for the prec. VE4EA called me later -- I said he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00167.html (12,195 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:51:53 -0600
Buffering, my boy, buffering! The online gamers don't seem to have too many problems. Yeah, there are outages and they shriek in fury. Our game would go on apace (except for maybe no spots) but there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00168.html (10,525 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:32:12 -0800
As great as that sounds, that will be a long time coming I expect and hope, considering how often my internet goes down... 73 jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00170.html (9,362 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:05 -0500
All very doable, with current logging software. Just not enough time to do everything.... 73, Gerry W1VE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00171.html (11,588 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: Matt Wilhelm <westcoastbayou@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:47:50 -0500
Wait are you telling me the log checking software won't accept HCTZ? AH CRAP! 73, MSW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00172.html (9,248 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 04:48:48 +0500
Ward, Very interesting. But this approach begs the question: If prescription finally got wrong (name of the medicine or dosage) who's fault is it? Transmitter or receiver? Should not both sides be pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00173.html (12,677 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:52:15 -0700
I believe the intent is to get the exchange correct during the contest period. If you blow the check or missed a number and waiting for him/her to send it again. I have no problem with that. I do tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00175.html (16,476 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu