Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Which\s+Coax\s+Jumpers\s+Reduce\s+SO2R\s+Interference\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Which Coax Jumpers Reduce SO2R Interference (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:43:28 -0800
Although both my radios have stubs (double stubs on 40 meters) and bandpass filters, I still suffer from more interstation interference than I would like when operating SO2R from my city lot. Thinkin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00438.html (7,455 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Which Coax Jumpers Reduce SO2R Interference (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai WK6I <wk6i@twistedoak.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:50:26 -0800
hi Ken - I am NO expert, but I have recently started running SO2R with only filters (no stubs yet) - and I have only one minor interaction between 20 and 40 and the rest is clean! This is at 1500W. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00001.html (8,740 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Which Coax Jumpers Reduce SO2R Interference (score: 1)
Author: "RCARIELLO" <RCARIELLO@si.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:09:25 -0000
Ken, My gut feeling is the N to PL259 adapters. Any type of connector has some leakage. With the adapters you have basically doubled the amount of leakage points. I am also trying to setup a SO2R sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00004.html (11,794 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Which Coax Jumpers Reduce SO2R Interference (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:11:52 -0600
Ken, The answer to the mystery may be in your description: Get rid of the adapters. You can get PL-259 and SO-239 hardline connectors. Even so, the hardline is probably overkill, and as some others h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00022.html (9,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu