Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+ARRL\s+SSB\s+Contest\s+is\s+Not\s+My\s+Favorite\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+ARRL\s+SSB\s+Contest\s+is\s+Not\s+My\s+Favorite\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Clarke" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:30:10 -0500; Ive always equated the ARRL DX Contest being what WAE is for stations in Europe. (Without the QTCs !) Everyone works only the W/VE. You can probably get better runs in W/VE with a smaller station tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00108.html (7,209 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:34:05 -0500 (EST); With guys like us who have big stations, the certificate is not as big a deal as someone who is using a GP on 20 with 100 W. I'm a firm believer in lots of categories so the little guys can get a pie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00118.html (9,072 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 22
Page: [1] [2]