Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+listening\s+time\s+$should\s+not$\s+count\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+listening\s+time\s+$should\s+not$\s+count\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Why listening time (should not) count (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Sat Feb 8 11:05:27 2003; That someone was me and I stand by it. IMO, the "fix" for this issue is setting a large minimum offtime and ontime. It's enforceable; limiting listening time is not. And larger minimum times will no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00124.html (8,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]