Just got my latest CQ -- and a bunch of info for CQWW SSB 2001 results are now moved to the web... How come we have not heard any complaints about that? 73, Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM
Perhaps because CQ is not the membership journal of our organization, but simply a business. CQ is not answerable to any of us, but ARRL should be. Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Located near Col
Apples and oranges here Gerry, One is a for-profit business ... they can move the WW results to billboards alongside the road if they chose to do so. Or they can chose to not print the results, or n
Yes, it was mentioned a few months back that the results were being eliminated from QST for financial reasons, but the announcement in ARLB046 stated: "the Board agreed that the ARRL Web site now pro
Because CQ still publishes the lines scores, top ten boxes, etc. As far as I can see, the only things moved to the web were the callsigns of the ops of the multi-op stations and a small box showing t
That's right folks, armageddon is looming. Tell you what Lee (and any others): I can help in this time of gloom! Send your new rig(s) to my call book address if you want. Oh, I'll take those pesky a
Yes, but I take CQ's changes personally -- I was one of the operators at without reading the web :-) My comment about CQ was just to stir the pot... This reflector provides great comedy in the off-co