- 1. [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Pederson <spederson@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:08:05 -0800 (PST)
- All, I encountered an incident a couple of times this last weekend during WPX SSB. Once was on 10m SSB working an SA station, and he gave me "sorry, worked before". I did not have him in my log (noth
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00527.html (7,164 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: asciibaron <asciibaron@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:40:24 -0500
- i had someone insist he worked me already in the contest the day before. too bad i was at my in-laws 3 hours away and no where near a radio. i tried to work him twice and both times way told i was a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00000.html (8,110 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave VO1AU" <VO1AU@rac.ca>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:37:46 -0330
- Scott: I agree with you. I generally work dupes when they call me because I suspect they either aren't using software to log, or they busted my call the first time they worked me. I know that a fair
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00001.html (9,170 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:12:47 +0000
- KI5DR's post reminded me of a little goof of my own in WPX SSB. Somewhat embarrassing, but I don't feel too bad about it. TS3A was CQing with one voice & replying to callers with another - one that I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00004.html (8,795 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:19:28 +0300
- I always agree to leave only the new QSO in the log in these cases. Plus I clearly say I will remove the first QSO. Keep your logs clean. 73, Jukka OH6LI _____________________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00011.html (9,437 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:18:33 -0000
- Why waste time editing out the first contact? By doing that you may be causing someone else to get a penalty who otherwise may not. For example in cqww. 1. you work k1ttm and log him as k1ttt either
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00013.html (12,469 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:58:57 -0600 (CST)
- In my final log submitted, yes. I always keep the original QSO in my base log. Say for example I work W1AR but log him as W1AA (I'm picking calls at random, sorry if I used yours as an example). Then
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00015.html (9,060 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:03:32 +0300
- In recent WPX I actually started to say "We've worked before, Roger?" I started to feel that it actually saves time compared to common thinking that just work them. That is due to the fact that actua
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00025.html (11,433 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: Hank Kohl K8DD <k8dd@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:25:24 -0500
- It happened several times in CQ WW CW from VO2AAA Zone 2 Labrador by some well known stations. And they would not belive they were not in our log. Oh well - can't wait to see the UBN. And we worked a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00031.html (10,495 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:52:31 -0800
- I would not remove it from the "log submitted" either. I don't see any advantage to doing this, since in the event of a genuine dupe, you have no idea which of the two QSOs you made the other station
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00034.html (9,795 bytes)
- 11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked Before... (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:13:13 -0800
- -- I encountered an incident a couple of times this last weekend during WPX SSB. Once was on 10m SSB working an SA station, and he gave me "sorry, worked before". -- Although only part-time in the WP
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00043.html (8,609 bytes)
- 12. [CQ-Contest] Worked before... (score: 1)
- Author: kk7gw@hotmail.com (David Jones)
- Date: Tue Jan 6 15:36:47 1998
- Well, I'm one of the low-power stations (with dipoles, not even a tribander). Currently I only use computer logging twice a year, when I can get my friend's computer for the November Sweepstakes her
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00090.html (7,800 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu