Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Working\s+Dupes\s+\[PLUS\s+more\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Working\s+Dupes\s+\[PLUS\s+more\]\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com); Date: Mon Dec 13 21:07:58 1999; << Another story on should we work dupes or not ... >> Yeah...work them! I was qrp, but actually had folks duping me! I told the first one "dupe" but then worked him anyway...from then on, I just wor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00093.html (7,761 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: sm3sgp@kkn.net (Gus Widell); Date: Wed Dec 15 00:52:59 1999; KR2Q: failed. CE5/SM3SGP: I had many stations coming back to me with "strange calls". If I would have corrected all of those my QSO count would probably been a lot less. Instead I tried to give my ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00113.html (7,663 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Dec 15 13:39:37 1999; It seems to me that there is a very sound convention for dealing with this that is widely practiced. If somebody comes back with your call correctly, DON'T repeat your call, ever. If he gets it sligh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00137.html (9,031 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed Dec 15 14:31:11 1999; correctly, call twice. time. One problem I've experienced: DX: CQ DX ME: N2MG DX: N2#$*#& 5915 So, you aren't sure if he got it right. If I hear what sounds like my call but I'm not sure, sometimes I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00141.html (8,980 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Fri Dec 17 21:42:12 1999; I would either 1) not come back, or 2) come back with N2MG or DE N2MG but withhold the exchange until the DX acknowleged by callsign. --Trey, N5KO -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00191.html (7,547 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes [PLUS more] (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Mon Dec 20 10:28:51 1999; At least two stations will be subject to NIL penalties in the Stew Perry contest, because they refused to work a "dupe". In each case a previous attempt at a contact was lost in the noise before conf; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00206.html (7,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]