Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+X\-land\s+QSO\s+Parties\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+X\-land\s+QSO\s+Parties\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "Marc Ziegler, W6ZZZ" <ziegler@accesscom.com>; Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 20:45:22 -0700; So far we have NEQP (1), CQP (6), and 7QP as X-land QSO Parties. Will this spark interest in having: 2QP, 3QP, 4QP, 5QP, 8QP, 9QP and 0QP contests? "Activity begets activity", so any approach that ge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00139.html (6,614 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:25:03 -0400; Hopefully it will? I would also like to see XQP organizers "standardize" their exchanges, especially when the XQP's overlap? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00140.html (8,080 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT); 9-land already has several successful QSO parties: IL, IN, WI. I don't see those going away. In 8-land, OH and MI are big, WV not so much. 0-land (except MN) and 5-land (except TX) are the weakest. 7; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00141.html (7,916 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:07:17 -0000; THere used to be a 0 land QSO party, sponsored for awhile by the Davenport (Iowa) Radio Amateur Club-I was contest chair for a year back during High School days. I think the last certificate I got fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00146.html (8,544 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:11:11 -0000; ALthough the Oklahoma QSO party is growing in popularity since being revived a couple of years ago. Iowa doesn't even have a QSO party anymore although they tried one in the mid 80s. 73s John W5TD (e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00147.html (8,875 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:38:57 -0400; Then there is the Mid Atlantic QSO party which picks up all of 2 and 3, with WV and VA for some of 4 and 8. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00152.html (8,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]