- 1. [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: Fabian Kurz <lists@telegraphy.de>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 04:09:14 +0200
- Hello all, I just decided to take part in the CQ-M contest in the QRP-category, but this excerpt from the rules puzzled me a bit: ,-- [ http://srr.ru/CONTEST/cq_m_4_eng.php ] --. '--' I have to send
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00161.html (8,866 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:09:05 +0600
- Fabian, I have told sponsors of the CQ-M about this mistake and they are committed to rectify the problem and delete this compulsory /QRP staff next year. Let us hope that they will be prudent enough
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00186.html (9,979 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: Fabian Kurz <lists@telegraphy.de>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:14:24 +0200
- That sounds great, thanks! 73, -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Dresden, Germany * http://fkurz.net/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00187.html (7,805 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@adelphia.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:01:42 -0400
- I don't like the rule at all. Contesters of all people should be discouraging the practice of signing /QRP rather than engouraging it! Condx were pretty lousy over the weekend, but I got on for about
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00198.html (7,051 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:29:48 +0000
- UA9CDC replied to DJ1YFK: The flip side of that is hopefully those who don't log the /QRP don't loose the Q in log checking. 73, VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________ CQ-Cont
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00206.html (7,763 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:04:34 -0600
- It was the requirement to /qrp that had me deciding not to enter this year, Now with the conditions, its just as well, I suppose. There is always next year. I wouldn't mind a /q occasionally, but for
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00209.html (8,664 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu