Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+check\s+log\s+charlie\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+check\s+log\s+charlie\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 22:05:29 -0500; someone wrote "If the USA station's log does not reflect the correct transmitting frequency, then the log should be considered a check log. In this age of ham radio software being free or at a very l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00198.html (7,864 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:29:01 -0700 (PDT); Scott, even if you DID buy a new radio it wouldn't make a difference. My radio is fairly recent (FTdx-5000) and my software is very recent (N1MM+). If I work a split, ie RX-7075/TX-7175, my log will; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00200.html (8,266 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 11:27:06 -0700; On Fri,5/8/2015 6:31 PM, w2lc@twcny.rr.com wrote: The software is not the big issue but the radio is. What is the cost of adding my transmit frequency to my log? About $5k USD for a good radio decent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00224.html (9,236 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 12:50:41 -0600; The entry price for a decent new radio comparable to a very good old one is FAR less than $5K. The TS590SG sells for about $1800. N0AX owns the earlier TS590S and likes it. N2IC has been having some; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00228.html (7,923 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: <w5gn@mxg.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 14:03:41 -0500; But that won't help with all Icoms 756+ and I think later that do not return a TX frequency, only the RX freq when split. 73 Barry, W5GN Gee -- how old is your radio, Scott? It's been quite a while s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00233.html (9,584 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 20:49:48 -0400; The XYL will decide this ... The entry price for a decent new radio comparable to a very good old one is FAR less than $5K. The TS590SG sells for about $1800. N0AX owns the earlier TS590S and likes i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00238.html (8,574 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 16:07:18 +0000; Jim K9YC said "Gee -- how old is your radio, Scott?" Guess I gotta come clean here Jim Well Jim, um, this is a bit embarrassing. For the amusement of everyone. My main radio is a TS930 and the second; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00255.html (9,922 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] check log charlie (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:24:34 -0700; Hi Tony, I see your problem. :) The radios I suggested, the K3 and the TS590S, tested very clean for CW bandwidth. No radio tested beats the K3, and the TS590S was second best. k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00264.html (9,110 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]