Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+conditions\s+for\s+10m\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:18:52 -0500
Hi all...the appearance of the OH, SM, TF and other Northern EU stations in the 10m contest really amaze me...I plugged the numbers in the W6EL propagation program and there is not a hint that this i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00250.html (6,703 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:35:50 -0600
Rick, I'm sure the propagation gurus will explain it to us, but that Scandinavian 10M opening is not unusual, good conditions or bad. In Texas it normally peaks just before our sunset, i.e. far into
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00253.html (7,489 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:19:50 +0100
It&acute;s Aurora Es. Too bad I missed it, totaly forgot about the contest. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00254.html (7,669 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:48:44 -0600
I worked OH2PM at 1818Z on Sunday. Following that I worked several stations in the Pacific NW, including 3 VE7's (SI, NL, & XF). Perhaps the path was over that area? I was running low power CW to a 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00256.html (8,942 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <per.e@kommunicera.umea.se>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:17:26 +0100
Was Aurora Es here in Northern Sweden. Probably around most of the north pole, more or less. Worked both OY:s 1377km and TF:s 1806km here on the first hop. They were very strong. Southern states came
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00258.html (9,537 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:14:24 -0800
This opening happens every year in the ARRL 10 Meter Contest, as far as I can tell, although it's never happened on both days of the same contest for me. The following are my observations from statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00259.html (9,080 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 14 Dec 2005 09:50:35 -0600
I had an observation similar to W5OVs. I worked three Scandanavian stations. (Per, at 1903UTC; OH6NIO at 1919UTC; and OH5UFO at 1744UTC) The contacts I worked either side of these: - W6, x8 - W7, x6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00260.html (9,212 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:54:01 +0200
Good evening all, W6EL SW knows the direct Sunlight ionizes, takes the flux number and trys to build on that. Same goes pretty much for VOACAP. www.voacap.com There are also other ways to ionise the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00263.html (9,915 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:30:25 -0500
Unusual propagation to Northern Europe has occurred for as long time. Roll the clock back to the CQ SSB Contest in 1970 (Now the WPX contest) and conditions were predicted to be stinko. Operating fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00267.html (9,449 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Gary Sutcliffe <w9xt@unifiedmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:11:54 -0600
This opening is quite common on 10 and 15M. It has given me OH/SM/LA and occasionally UA multipliers a number of times the normal opening earlier in the day did not go that far north. I always make a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00270.html (9,219 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:02:49 +0200
But this was also sunspot maximum time? Any observations that over the pole path in the evening on 10 meters has happened during _the bottom_ of sunspot cycle? I can't remember any at least in CQWWCW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00271.html (9,134 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:13:24 -0500
WM5R: It's quite common and I've observed it since 1976 from Colorado, Washington (at W7XR) and here in NC. It normally happens during mid to late afternoon local time. It's actually more unusual whe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00273.html (8,781 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:34:44 -0500
I wouldn't say we are at the bottom of the sunspot cycle yet. Sunday's solar flux was 93, SSN 51. The 90 day moving average is around solar flux = 85. A better question would be whether the night ti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00274.html (9,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu