Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqww\s+cw\s+spotting\s+report\s*$/: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:33:44 -0600 (CST)
yes, that is frequently the case. this kind of diminishes the effectiveness of cheerleading since many cluster users filter the spots so they only see ones originating near them... so many stateside
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00036.html (7,875 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "wally" <wally@el-soft.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:50:53 +0200
Hi David, For some reason, LZ2NP knows himself only, he was spotting LZ9W on one and the same frequency each two minutes sending 6 - 7 spots at once. We waited for a while ,if he would stop this by h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00037.html (9,297 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:38:11 -0600
Well I asked this same question (without the RBN component) last year and it pretty much fell on deaf ears. As you know, the "No self spotting" is written into the rules, so that's how it's gonna be.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00045.html (9,485 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:27:41 -0600
I am new to all this spotting stuff. But when someone is running a freq, say as the below example, LZ9W. and someone K9XYZ comes and works him, and his program is set to spot all S&P contacts, doesn'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00046.html (11,982 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:12:19 -0600 (CST)
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00047.html (7,881 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:18:55 +0100
Unfortunately for me I live on the other side of the pond and do have to live with this cr@p... I haven't given it much thought but now that the CQ WW committee is becoming more and more aggressive t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00048.html (9,382 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:21:36 +0000
I was referring to the RBN, not Skimmer. Anyone who calls CQ on-air is self-spotting on the RBN - that's partly my point. It's generally considered OK to call CQ on-air, especially in contests. Howev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00049.html (8,810 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "wally" <wally@el-soft.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:00:06 +0200
David, Do you really think we were foolish enough to ask for some cheerleading spotting on DX Summit, when we've been spotted by Skimmers of RBN may be few thousand times on all bands ? Total of 67 s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00050.html (8,786 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:27:37 -0600 (CST)
The skimmer servers by default will not spot the owner's callsign. That is why you will see my skimmer missing during some contests, i have changed the callsign to the operator's call for that weeken
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00051.html (9,322 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:12:24 -0800
I'm going to get myself a bowl of popcorn and watch this one! 73, K0HB "Just a boy and his popcorn" _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00053.html (9,030 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:28:38 -0600 (CST)
I am doing all i can do by posting my findings on line so that all of you out there can apply peer pressure on those who may be doing something unethical. I also supply the same data to the contest l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00054.html (9,975 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "wally" <wally@el-soft.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:12:57 +0200
David, You are now making unacceptable accusations on public list which you definetly CAN NOT prove ! Why should we ask someone to spot us on DX Summit just 67 times, when for 48 hours our callsign w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00056.html (11,088 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:18:33 +0000
N1mm has logic that prevents automatic spotting when the call is already in the bandmap. Many cluster nodes also have filters that remove dupes within some time period, typically 10-15 minutes, and s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00057.html (14,807 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:27:15 +0000
and that is all you have to do to get spotted on the regular cluster network also... so what is the difference? David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00058.html (8,974 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:14:51 +0000
Did I say that you had asked for them to spot you?? David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00059.html (9,886 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:16:01 +0900
No sign here that RBN or skimmers, etc. are diminishing bad spots. Out of 1450 contacts on 40 SB, I logged 66 dupes (4.6%) but would have had many more had I not decided about 3/4 of the way through
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00060.html (11,201 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:26:52 -0500
I do not understand this posture. Of course, we should CQ on the air. If that results in one's being spotted every 10-15 minutes, well... Nobody makes anyone use packet, or the RBN, or any combinatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00061.html (11,173 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:08:53 +0000
The difference is simple! You call CQ on-air and you get spotted by the RBN - no exceptions (assuming you are heard by at least one RBN receiver). In this context, calling CQ and self-spotting are on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00062.html (10,590 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:02:05 -0800
Hi Joe You can set N1MM to never spot any stations automatically. You can still spot individual stations if you want to. (The <Spot It> button in the entry window or, I think, CTRL-P) 73, Jim Smith V
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00064.html (10,770 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:10:52 -0600
Thanks Jim, The main reason i was asking this is most contests lately i'm just in there to give away points and or look for new states, countries, etc. Which would be no problem except I'm running an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00067.html (11,944 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu