Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+\#\,\s+Honest\s+RST\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+\#\,\s+Honest\s+RST\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #, Honest RST (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HEADRICK" <W3CP@CHARTER.NET>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:34:34 -0000; Steve, At least through the 1950s and early 1960s reports were not a standard 599. In looking through some of my old logs I find I very seldom gave or received a S9. However back then the measure was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00031.html (9,707 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #, Honest RST (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:44:47 -0400 (GMT-04:00); I don't think so. There wasn't much computer logging being done when I started playing this game in the late 70s/early 80s but my logs indicate pretty much universal 59(9) reports. So it started way; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00039.html (7,068 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #, Honest RST (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:11:51 -0000; I was contesting in 68-69 from Japan as KA2RM and those logs were 99 percent 599 25 or 599 500 in ARRL test and the ARRL DX was 2 weekends then. Quack _______________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00046.html (8,416 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #, Honest RST (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:50:38 +0000; I agree. I haven't dug out my old contest logs (may not even have them any longer) but from what I rember, "honest" reports were pretty common through at least the very early '70s. Then the two west; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00052.html (10,509 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]