Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+line\s+scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+line\s+scores\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:50:19 -0500; More data: From Bob Cox in February 2002 -- "...about 30,000 active in the CQ WW SSB and about 22,000 in the CW leg +/-. There are ~97,000 different calls or "somethings" in the SSB database for exam; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00117.html (10,719 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:33:08 -0800 (PST); How about 1 annual special issue that includes all the previous year's linescores, writeups, etc.? Maybe something like "contesting yearbook 2003". I would pay extra for it, and save it. I LOVE to se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00122.html (11,821 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Rick Stoneking" <w2rds@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:08:27 -0500; There is no doubt about it - contestors are not only not THE big group, they are not even A big group. I downloaded the scores from the 2002 ARRL DX SSB and CW contests (back before line scores were; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00124.html (17,838 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:48:08 -0800 (PST); (http://www.designet.com/k1ir/Downloads/ContestProposal_071702.pdf) == message truncated == __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Lear; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00130.html (18,538 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:38:18 -0000; Let me set the record straight: I 'NEVER' used the word conspiracy or implied or suggested conspiracy. I am merely suggesting there is more to the decision than the general membership is aware of. Ve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00131.html (18,880 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:57:06 -0800; The picnic-ers do, in fact, look at them, even though they claim "not to be contesters". This is where they get their start. It's a financial decision, pure and simple, not to print line scores. By t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00134.html (11,868 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:11:24 -0800 (PST); The problem is, what are you going to threated the manufactures with? Never again buy their product? They know better than that. Who else are you going to buy a contest quality radio from? it isn't s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00137.html (9,841 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:20:47 -0000; Well once guys are putting words in my mouth. I NEVER said, or implied or suggested, threatening the manufactures. Here is a rough draft of a letter I will send to Yaesu: Dear Sirs: 2 months ago I pu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00152.html (11,400 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:40:55 EST; help support your customers needs, especially in area of contesting, contesting activities, and contest reporting. The end result might lead to more sales of your fine products like the Ft 1000MP.<<; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00158.html (8,912 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Rick Stoneking" <w2rds@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:06:27 -0500; Maybe it is just me but sure sounds like you are suggesting a threat against both QST and the "advertisers" (i.e. the "Big 5") to me... Rick W2RDS -- Original Message -- From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00162.html (12,220 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:11:20 +0300; Its interesting why NCJ is not publishing ARRL contest results I know NCJ is ARRL magazine also? If not then really NCJ is in difficult position and they are magazine from contester with difficulties; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00163.html (14,272 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:12:13 -0800; The NCJ was not originally an ARRL publication. It started out as a small, self-published newsletter. As it grew in size and subscriber base, eventually a deal was struck with the ARRL to support it'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00172.html (16,362 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:23:55 +0300; Hi Ken, That will be great if NCJ will publish ARRL contest results That will make contest more popular for sure I dont know if contests organizers will stop publish contest results or just publish s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00174.html (11,495 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:31:35 -0800; Perhaps you've misunderstood. Even though the ARRL publishes the NCJ, the ARRL does not determine the content ofthe NCJ. The editor of QST is not the editor of the NCJ, and the contest administrators; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00183.html (12,115 bytes)
35. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:34:40 -0500; So all the scores get published for field day so the picknickers can not look at them? Not publish scores for events where all the people care about is the scores? Dosn't make sense. And the VHF cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00195.html (10,047 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 20:05:30 -0500; Yes...I remember when ARRL took over publication of the NCJ...one of my great fears was that they would move the contest reporting from QST to NCJ. I was assured that this would not happen, that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00224.html (11,590 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:53:26 -0500; Lee, I agree with you in principle; that is, the line scores belong in QST, should never have been taken out, and should be returned. But, considering that I don't think those options are viable at p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00246.html (12,654 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:40:24 -00; handheld? Yuri, We get the picture. You hold the "SOTB" people in some disdain. Too bad for you (and them) because that's where the future radiosport players have to come from. Talked to a young fel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00360.html (11,981 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:48:16 EST; for you (and them) because that's where the future radiosport players have to come from. << No you don't. I have nothing against SOTB or novices. I finally got one of my sons to become KG4TBS and wor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00361.html (8,654 bytes)
40. [CQ-Contest] line scores (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (Bruce Makas); Date: Tue Jul 23 16:59:43 2002; In a separate resolution approved by voice vote, the Board agreed that the ARRL Web site now provides a better medium to report the results of ARRL-sponsored contests, and line scores no longer will; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00374.html (6,666 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]