Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+making\s+lemonade\s+\(was\:\s+ARRL\s+report\s+on\s+line\s+scores\s+decision\)\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
Date: Thu Jul 25 19:10:31 2002
Have you ever noticed that contest results take so long to appear in magazines that sometimes you can't remember whether or not you actually operated the particular contest you are reading about at t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00433.html (13,386 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer)
Date: Thu Jul 25 23:49:01 2002
I was originally against this proposal when I first heard of it as it forces us to process some of our Fall contest logs during probably the busiest contest month of the year, November. As it stands
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00437.html (9,732 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS)
Date: Fri Jul 26 10:05:13 2002
<<SNIP>> I fully support this proposal. Something like this was EXACTLY what I was hoping would be the consequence of moving the line scores out of QST. As for some of your assumptions... Personally,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00445.html (11,415 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Jul 26 09:18:52 2002
I think you're right Pete, the big improvement in what Trey is proposing comes from challenging the log checkers (and maybe even the article writers) to turn things around ASAP rather than working to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00453.html (7,324 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Jul 26 10:31:19 2002
It's unclear to which date that 45 day lead time is measured relative. The ad deadline for QST is something like 45 days prior to the date of issue so it makes sense if that was the editorial deadlin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00457.html (9,323 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
Date: Fri Jul 26 21:10:28 2002
contests and then Maybe to encourage people to join the ARRL? Seems a reasonable goal since they are sponsoring the event... Randy, K5ZD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00465.html (10,859 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Jul 26 17:27:36 2002
The long lead times go back to the early days of most contests when all of the logs were submitted on (horrors!) paper, including dupe sheets, and hand-written to boot. The long time lags were once r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00467.html (11,453 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS)
Date: Fri Jul 26 19:08:42 2002
No, it's not good enough. I say let's try the proposal for a season. It will force the remaining entrants to use or find electronic means. It will force us all to be a tad more prompt with the submi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00469.html (10,653 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer)
Date: Fri Jul 26 22:52:59 2002
since contests. I don't think this is what makes a "membership" organization tick. ARRL sponsors the contests precisely TO attract membership. They don't have members so they can sponsor contests. In
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00478.html (9,736 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Jul 26 23:44:28 2002
Sorry Gary, but you and I will disagree with this one for now. Considering the outcry last year when (under the dubious excuse of safety of the mail) CQ Magazine forced all of us to enter only by ele
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00480.html (11,807 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS)
Date: Sat Jul 27 01:49:41 2002
Ron, we agree on one point. We disagree with each other -HI. Although I like the "for now" part :-) To your points: 1. Outcry: People hate change. We live with it and move on. This is no different. 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00482.html (15,134 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Sat Jul 27 22:23:16 2002
Gary, Sorry to be so long to reply, out some LookOut, er, Outlook Express problems all day. I think the key disagreement we have is over the current level of available technology and human interactio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00512.html (13,731 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: brianmiller@xtra.co.nz (Brian Miller)
Date: Sun Jul 28 22:30:07 2002
Hi all I have been working with the Oceania DX Contest Committee on the 2001 results. presentation of results for a MAJOR contest within 2 weeks. It might be possible if 1. ALL logs are in the correc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00515.html (10,074 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu