Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+memory\s+keyers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+memory\s+keyers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (BRUCE MAKAS); Date: Sun Feb 17 09:12:49 2002; This has probably been hashed out before, but .... Is there a consensus out there on what is the best memory keyer? I'm lean= ing towards the Idiom Press K3. 73, Bruce K1MY -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00231.html (6,426 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (BRUCE MAKAS); Date: Sun Feb 17 09:12:49 2002; This has probably been hashed out before, but .... Is there a consensus out there on what is the best memory keyer? I'm lean= ing towards the Idiom Press K3. 73, Bruce K1MY -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00419.html (6,453 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:03:36 -0500; Hi all...we use 7 of the K1EA DVP's and 2 of the MFJ voice keyers...they are all just dandy...de Rick _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00230.html (7,356 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:49:48 -0500; On Nov 10, 2004, at 4:03 PM, Rick Dougherty NQ4I wrote: we use 7 of the K1EA DVP's and 2 of the MFJ voice keyers...they are all just dandy... The nice thing about the DVP at a M/M like Rick's is that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00239.html (8,255 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:19:19 EST; Sure was interesting watching KA6SAR run ~ 200 / hr on 10m Sunday while using my voice to CQ.... I have never been a fan of different voices for the CQ machine and the op. As I S/P around, I occasion; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00248.html (7,855 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: ALANNOTTAGE@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:45:19 EST; Neither have I Bill. Aesthetically (or what ever the aural equivalent is) it just sounds crass. It can also send the subliminal message that the operator can't be bothered to program his own voice, w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00265.html (8,560 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:27:30 -0800; Absolutely. Even after a few years of serious phone contesting, I find that I have a much better chance of understanding what someone is saying the second time I hear them transmit. The very first ti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00272.html (10,870 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] memory keyers (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:17:39 -0500; On Nov 11, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote: I have never been a fan of different voices for the CQ machine and the op. As I S/P around, I occasionally hear that scenario. I don't think it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00455.html (8,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]