Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+might\-right\s+\"ethics\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+might\-right\s+\"ethics\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] might-right "ethics" (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com); Date: Fri Feb 25 13:30:59 2000; Fellow Contesters: This is NOT a yes/no type question, despite it being very PC to say, "Of course not." As already pointed out, this IS a contest. The serious types are in it to win...the propagatio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00162.html (9,524 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] might-right "ethics" (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Fri Feb 25 13:42:41 2000; While I agree with Doug that an unproductive frequency is fair game, I just can't justify deliberately breaking up someone's run. I'd like to think there is some reasonable compromise between being c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00169.html (8,212 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] might-right "ethics" (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Fri Feb 25 15:52:31 2000; No. I'm proposing that the stronger stations make it possible for some of the weaker ones to work EACH OTHER, which just might make it more likely some of them will continue to participate in contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00175.html (7,408 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] might-right "ethics" (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri Feb 25 17:41:04 2000; It's called "running higher in the band". Granted, not all bands have enough room. Oh well. Mike N2MG -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00178.html (6,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]