Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+more\s+1\s+station\,\s+2callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+more\s+1\s+station\,\s+2callsigns\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: W2XL@aol.com (W2XL); Date: Sun Dec 14 14:12:28 1997; Interesting replies to my post about using more than one callsign at a station for a given contest. The rules I quoted from Dec QST have been printed for EVERY ARRL contest, except the ARRL 160 'test; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00288.html (8,041 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: kl7y@alaska.net (Dan Robbins); Date: Sun Dec 14 22:27:06 1997; I disagree with the rule. Suppose I decided to open my station up to give some non-contesters a chance to get their feet wet. Maybe they are new hams, maybe they just don't have room for HF antnennas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00291.html (8,876 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: ka0rny@midusa.net (Nate Bargmann); Date: Tue Dec 16 00:04:42 1997; Hi Dan and all. This is a very thought provoking thread! An initial reaction is, "The rulz is the rulz," but after more thought this is an interesting perspective. I assume when you talk about allowi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00316.html (11,270 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Mon Dec 15 18:52:06 1997; Benefit to WHOM? Besides this thread is about ARRL contests and ARRL's new rules. The scenario you describe is already done frequently in CQ contests and is just fine per their rules. And what harm w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00321.html (8,010 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: becker@SPRINTMAIL.COM (Tony and Celia Becker); Date: Mon Dec 15 23:00:55 1997; Hi All! Last month I sat in at N6RO's with two other ops for CQWW CW. We each used a different call and we each submitted a Single Operator Single Band score. I know I speak for all three of us when; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00327.html (7,396 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: froberts@pe.net (Fred Roberts); Date: Tue Dec 16 15:15:38 1997; --F02B0051B472A446BA631D64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dan Seems to me that your dilemma is resolved if everyone operates with their own calls, and ever; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00358.html (9,374 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] more 1 station, 2callsigns (score: 1): Author: w2up@itw.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Wed Dec 17 01:58:16 1997; FLASH - From the ARRL: Under recently adopted rules, you may submit logs with a second callsign for a $10 fee + 1 cent for every QSO above 100. .) <==for the humo(u)r impaired. -- Barry Kutner, W2UP; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00363.html (7,716 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]