Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+on\s+line\s+scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+on\s+line\s+scores\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Rick Dougherty <rick@nq4i.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:55:04 -0500; Soap Box- I want to commend the teams that took the time to post their scores on the cqcontest.ru site. Our friends in UA have dove an excellent job in making the site easy to use and very accurate.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00275.html (8,299 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Steve Dyer <w1srd@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:20:39 -0800; I am super excited about the idea of real-time posting AND scoring. It would be a tool to attract a lot of very positive attention to radio sport. A real game changer that would allow us to promote c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00282.html (9,761 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:59:59 -0700; I don't think it adds a thing to anyone not actually in the contest. I can't imagine that more than a handful of non-contesters are going to spend any time at all watching a set of numbers increment; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00288.html (12,382 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:35:06 -0700; Sorry, but that's a really silly analogy. Golf is a paid spectator event ... CQWW is not. And what possible relevance does the use of Skimmer or packet assistance have to your proposed paranoia? What; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00292.html (10,349 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:33:25 -0500; "As the contesting community has adjusted to the requirement for logs to be sent in and posted for all to see, it is now time to change this unnecessary behavior and openly post your score for all to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00294.html (8,562 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:44:32 -0600 (CST); Why stop here? Why not require webcams in every shack, so that any voyeur out there can watch us operate? Soon enough, require bio-metric sensors on each operator, so that any voyeur can monitor our; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00300.html (10,075 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:56:43 -0700; Dave, Actually, it could help contestants. N1MM could probe the online scoreboard for the same class you are and report back that you are XXXX points ahead or XXXX points behind. This could be used a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00326.html (14,070 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:04:07 -0600 (CST); Mike, While you may be right that this would be an aid to SOME operators, and will act to their benefit... not everyone may agree with you. Why force it on people who don't wish to do it? 73 Dave, Ac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00334.html (14,943 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: "Steve, NR4M" <steve@nr4m.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:33:56 -0500; ...And, in the future will the software send out email alerts when someone makes a band change, so all competitors in the same class will know. Strategy is important, and I am NOT in favor of anythin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00341.html (16,886 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:38:56 -0700; I thought the requirement of requiring entrants to use a scoreboard type application was over the top. There are still many places in the world where the internet is poor, does not exist or is expens; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00342.html (14,971 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: N1MM <tfwagner@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:20:52 -0500; I like posting my score to the scores sites. Why? Because seeing another comparable station there provides incentive to compete. I think there is probably more value there than in the spectator benef; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00347.html (12,084 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:07:02 -0600 (CST); I have no problem with anyone who wishes to voluntarily participate in a scores site. If you think you'll get something out of it, if you think it will help you in some way, then go for it, have fun,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00349.html (12,424 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] on line scores (score: 1): Author: XV4Y <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:42:57 +0700; Hi, While I agree we have to make contesting more attractive for the new generations who are used to "instant results, instant satisfaction" (or frustration), this could be difficult to achieve for r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00379.html (10,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]