http://www.radio-sport.net/cqww_10cw.htm This guy must be a joke ! :-) How LZ9W can be moved from Unassisted to Assisted category when since 2002 we always participated as MULTI-MULTI in all CQ WW co
Calling NS3T a joke seems unwarranted to me. It's not "copy/paste journalism" if the original error came from the contest sponsor, as it appears to have in this case. LZ9W does indeed show as multi-o
Wally: With all due respect: Don't shoot the messenger. Jaime is reporting the results, and changes in categories, that he was told by the CWQ WW committee. If he was misinformed of the LZ9W entry ca
Jamie NS3T has now changed the text of his news message presenting the situation like I am complaining for something obviously very simple - a typing mistake ! What we have been offended by/complaine
It is very difficult for anyone to ever admit they could have done a better job. QST just published an article telling Hams to measure voltages inside a live amplifier with 3100 volts just inches fro
Even if someone has made an error, does that mean we throw civility to the wind and call him a complete joke? Let those without sin cast the first stone. 73, Kelly ve4xt -- Listen to THE ROAD TRIP on
Kelly, When one is accusing us in front of the world by making insulting comments like - "you are well known call around the world and you have cheated", we THINK we NEED to defend ourselves ! As I w
Wally, The Jamies of the world simply operate that way. They contest about how many people go to read their webpage. By doing what he is doing, he sure gets readers. But to the question, are the read
Bad press. The contest version of "News of the World", written by a non contester. Like many, I was once hurt by some twisted information there. That tabloid deserves no credit or even comments. Marc
What on earth are you talking about???? 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
Sending some emails does not establish a skillset - nor knowledgeset - for being able to actually really contest, nor about knowing what the contests really are about. To me, the contests are about i
Again, he is a contest operator. Simply look up the results from CQWW, Sweepstakes, ARRL DX, or CQ160. He's there. So can we now expect an apology from borderline libelous statements against NS3T? 73
Comparing NS3T's web site to the discredited tabloid "News Of The World" is more than a bit much. C'mon. The point was made. Heaping it on to the point of insults is overkill... and starts to make me
Big turmoil about a re-reported mistake quoted from a source on one hand (to be corrected of course), but deafening silence about power cheating on the other hand. Interesting priorities with regard
Chris, What power cheating are you alleging? What contest? By who? What power were they running? How do you know? Can it be proven? How? We need some good investigative reporting on this subject. Ano
It has been like that forever among contesters. People are more willing to ignore a confirmed cheat than they are the presumably honest mistake of a useful contest resource. An error outside of a con
Do you mean 'we need a spy for this subject'? Maybe a spy... Oh boy... Contesting future is not like it used to be... 73, Luc __ PW7T Team member WRTC.2010 Brazilian Team Leader PY8AZT (also PT7AG, P
Hello Bob, about power cheating and proof I could simply rely on this recent post http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2011-September/095321.html - but better add: E73M accused two operat
The Contest Advisory Committee should never have been operating in secret. CAC represents contesters. What possible internal communications about their deliberations should be kept from that constit
we What a lot of finger-waggling at Jamie NS3T over nothing. 1. The CQWW Contest Committee (or staff) made the error, listing M/M LZ9W among those re-categorized to "Assisted": http://www.cq-amateur