Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+true\s+RST\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+true\s+RST\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] true RST (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HEADRICK" <W3CP@CHARTER.NET>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:54:20 -0500; Paul, my 1957 ARRL DX log shows a variety of RST numbers, and I received almost no 599s. I guess many like me didn't have a S meter that meant anything so their signal strength was a subjective estim; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00491.html (12,884 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] true RST (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:04:04 -0800 (PST); Signal strength is still supposed to be a subjective estimate. If you look at the description of the RST system, it never says anything about the S portion being an S meter reading. 73s John AA5JG ht; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00494.html (14,131 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]