Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Final\s+QSL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Final\s+QSL\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Final QSL (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@seattleu.edu (Ward Silver); Date: Sun Mar 28 11:38:53 1993; DE: N0AX, Ward It would seem to me that giving some positive confirmation of receipt by the running station would accomplish two things: a) release the calling station unambiguously, and b) give a "s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00320.html (7,397 bytes)
2. Final QSL (score: 1): Author: KM9P@delphi.com (KM9P@delphi.com); Date: Sun Mar 28 21:31:37 1993; I don't think there is anything wrong with sending only your callsign for confirmation. As long as you are consistant. The only DX contesting I've done was from KP2A in WPX CW. Trey and I confimed ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00322.html (7,343 bytes)
3. Final QSL (score: 1): Author: g-taylor4@tamu.edu (g-taylor4@tamu.edu); Date: Sun Mar 28 18:56:56 1993; I concur, as a QRP station I'm usually in the S&P mode so don't always know if thats the way the operator works the pileup or if he just lost me. I sure don't want to fool around trying to get heard; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00335.html (7,613 bytes)
4. Final QSL (score: 1): Author: g-taylor4@tamu.edu (g-taylor4@tamu.edu); Date: Mon Mar 29 08:25:42 1993; My apologies if this is a repost, I'm having problems getting out. -- Forwarded Message Follows -- To: cq-contest@tgv.com I concur, as a QRP station I'm usually in the S&P mode so don't always know i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00336.html (7,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]