- 1. GAS (score: 1)
- Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL)
- Date: Wed Jul 13 16:59:42 1994
- K1AR's questions of what we want to see in the annual CQ contesting survey arrived last week here on Inet. I gave it considerable thought and penned, what, IMHO, I thought were pertinent issues. One
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00032.html (13,172 bytes)
- 2. GAS (score: 1)
- Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL)
- Date: Wed Jul 13 18:38:50 1994
- Well, John, if thats how everyone feels then I must be from another planet. Because the folks I talk to think it *is* an issue that is worthy of discussion, albeit there is no known cure for the pro
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00033.html (10,282 bytes)
- 3. GAS (score: 1)
- Author: RKILE@delphi.com (RKILE@delphi.com)
- Date: Wed Jul 13 23:43:16 1994
- High power Ops..... My participation has been limited to 160 meter contests since the early to mid 70's. This period has been long enough for contesting on 160 to evolve from W1BB's dipole between th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00036.html (10,323 bytes)
- 4. GAS (score: 1)
- Author: bill.lumnitzer@paonline.com (bill.lumnitzer@paonline.com)
- Date: Fri Jul 15 15:53:44 1994
- GS> 3. Power beyond that allowed by your country's GS> telecommunications authority is ILLEGAL. I have the following comments to add: 1. I think a pervasive rationalization is that violating FCC reg
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00053.html (12,749 bytes)
- 5. GAS (score: 1)
- Author: dcurtis@mipos2.intel.com (dcurtis@mipos2.intel.com)
- Date: Fri Jul 15 16:41:44 1994
- de Steve K8LX: This one's is so easy, even I can comment. U.S. law says measure at the amp's output, so you measure at the amp's output. U.K. law (as I understand it) says measure at the antenna inpu
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00056.html (6,834 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu