Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lawyerphobia\?\s+You\s+Bet\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lawyerphobia\?\s+You\s+Bet\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Lawyerphobia? You Bet! (score: 1): Author: ky1h@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu Aug 8 22:24:01 1996; whats even worse, you don't even have to be actually violating the rules for someone to sue you. just the fact that the rule exists is enough of an admission by the federal government that there MAY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00050.html (9,419 bytes)
2. Lawyerphobia? You Bet! (score: 1): Author: ND8L@aol.com (ND8L@aol.com); Date: Sun Aug 11 19:22:07 1996; Hi Bill... Interesting comments...but the lack of a ham's ability to prove he/she was in compliance...would be the downfall of anyone trying to prove he/she WASN'T in compliance. "No, your Honor, I h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00070.html (11,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]