Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposed\s+New\s+Contest\s+Exchange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposed\s+New\s+Contest\s+Exchange\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Proposed New Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: n0dh@comtch.iea.com (n0dh@comtch.iea.com); Date: Thu Apr 4 22:43:58 1996; Bruce 1) I agree we need more meanigful exchanges for most contests. 2) The HEX idea is I fear in reality no better than than 59(9) because it can be "calculated" by an easy subroutine which would qu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00034.html (18,715 bytes)
2. Proposed New Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Thu Apr 4 21:35:05 1996; The KCJ contest (if I recall correctly) uses a randomly generated number for each contact. -- George Fremin III Austin, Texas C.K.U. "You don't need an antenna that big to work 40 meters." WB5VZL -L; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00039.html (19,746 bytes)
3. Proposed New Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Mon Apr 8 23:50:25 1996; Where did you get this? I see nothing in the arrl dxcc rules that talk about signal reports. They dont really talk about the info exchanged during the contact - but they do require that the confifmat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00071.html (10,025 bytes)
4. Proposed New Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (frenaye@pcnet.com); Date: Mon Apr 8 23:54:33 1996; The signal report/DXCC issue has come up before and this is what I recall: No signal report is required for a card to count for DXCC as long as the mode is indicated. (and no mode is necessary if a s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00072.html (9,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]