Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QDC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QDC\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. QDC (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat Apr 6 13:58:56 1996; it By SIGNING your call after every QSO, you've satisfied ALL of the above categories.You've given contestants #2, #3 and #4 the info they need to either move on without bothering you or working you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00052.html (7,758 bytes)
2. QDC (score: 1): Author: albraun@socketis.net (albraun@socketis.net); Date: Sat Apr 6 22:23:34 1996; Based on my experience recently operating the ARRL DX (CW) contest from V3, I agree with this completely. It doesn't add much extra time to ID each QSO & saves a lot of noise on the frequency. We we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00054.html (10,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]