Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QRP\s+S\-W\-E\-E\-P\-stakes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QRP\s+S\-W\-E\-E\-P\-stakes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price); Date: Mon Nov 9 08:08:40 1992; -- I got my first ever SWEEP on QRP and only the second one I've ever had. In fact I got the sweep at about 1900Z and seriously considered calling it "good enough." Totals: 467 QSOs 77 sections 72K p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00043.html (8,343 bytes)
2. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker); Date: Mon Nov 9 10:05:24 1992; Nice going Jim, and congrats on the SWEEP. You had a great signal up here in Utah, especially on 20, but then, everyone in W6 is strong up here on 20 - especially during mid day. As for that bonehead; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00044.html (7,285 bytes)
3. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: CURTIN%NKUVAX.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (Daniel J. Curtin); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:56:36 1992; Jim, I am a very casual prec A op. I love to work QRP stations. It adds spice to the contest, and I bet they are often louder than I, with my puny antennas. I am very impressed with your QRP sweep. K; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00047.html (6,984 bytes)
4. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00049.html (7,252 bytes)
5. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET (tekbspa!tavan@uunet.UU.NET); Date: Tue Nov 10 10:42:03 1992; repl: bad addresses: derek.@TGV.COM, craigr@cod.nosc.mil -- no sub-domain in domain-part of address (@) Jim, you probably should have named the lid who refused to work Q stations. Your fine score is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00072.html (7,455 bytes)
6. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00194.html (7,227 bytes)
7. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00208.html (7,240 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]