Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QST\s+Contest\s+Coverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QST\s+Contest\s+Coverage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. QST Contest Coverage (score: 1): Author: pduff@subzero.austin.ibm.com ( Phil Duff - NA4M); Date: Thu Nov 5 15:07:36 1992; I wouldn't go so far as to eliminate all contest results in QST, but reducing the coverage to just a summary of the top scores would probably be a better compromise. This would reduce the number of p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00024.html (6,524 bytes)
2. QST Contest Coverage (score: 1): Author: hurta@ap040.dseg.ti.com (Dwaine Hurta); Date: Thu Nov 5 16:16:29 1992; It's very important that QST continues to report contest results, or I'm afraid that some will take the "missing" contest reports as a sign that the ARRL no longer supports contesting. But the covera; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00025.html (7,014 bytes)
3. QST Contest Coverage (score: 1): Author: pescatore_jt%ncsd.dnet@gte.com (pescatore_jt%ncsd.dnet@gte.com); Date: Fri Nov 6 09:40:34 1992; In the U.S., our contest scores are made up of QSO's from: 1. Full time serious entrants - those of us who want more contest coverage in QST. 2. Part time serious entrants - still want more coverage; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00028.html (9,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]