Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REAL\s+Multi\-single\s+$ARRL\s+DX$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REAL\s+Multi\-single\s+$ARRL\s+DX$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. REAL Multi-single (ARRL DX) (score: 1): Author: AA4NC@aol.com (AA4NC@aol.com); Date: Wed Aug 14 20:43:14 1996; I think AA4LR stated it very well: Why don't we do it this way in the ARRL DX Test? This will allow smaller multiops to be competitive, as well as allowing a "suitcase" expedition to be competitive i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00088.html (7,193 bytes)
2. REAL Multi-single (ARRL DX) (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 15 00:28:39 1996; Will -- I agree!!! As someone said recently, I'm in favor of anything that'll make it more fun. Being able to slither around the bands, breaking pileups and working mults unimpeded by a ten minute wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00091.html (17,510 bytes)
3. REAL Multi-single (ARRL DX) (score: 1): Author: smlondon@lucent.com (smlondon@lucent.com); Date: Thu Aug 15 08:26:13 1996; I might point out that changing the rules to make it more fun for a M/S could make it less fun for single-op stations. Under the current 10-minute rule, a M/S station must abandon their RUN frequency; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00092.html (22,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]