Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RF\s+Exposure\s+Rules\s+\-\s+N6NB\'s\s+Comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RF\s+Exposure\s+Rules\s+\-\s+N6NB\'s\s+Comments\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RF Exposure Rules - N6NB's Comments (score: 1): Author: WD8AUB@IX.NETCOM.COM (Douglas L. Klein); Date: Wed Aug 7 20:06:42 1996; Hey, I resemble that remark about the IRS. Doug, WD8AUB (IRS Internal Revenue Agent) P.S. There is a bunch of negative press about the IRS, especially during the crunch of an election year, and the b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00033.html (10,541 bytes)
2. RF Exposure Rules - N6NB's Comments (score: 1): Author: jefray@comsys.net (Jerry Fray); Date: Thu Aug 8 01:56:33 1996; You've GOT to be kidding right????????????? 38 percentile and rising! :-( Jerry No, this is not so. The FCC is making a rule. It does not matter a whit what the FCC is or is not "really" asking. The; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00036.html (16,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]